![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Years ago, this was purported to be a way of exercising with minimal exertion or effort:

Now we have the Legxercise Ellipse and the Legxercise Pro.


While I would agree that these electrically-powered devices might minimally improve circulation and muscle tone (especially for the infirmed or elderly), the benefits are marginal, at best. If these devices required actual muscle energy rather than an electrical motor, at least the caloric burn would be more considerable. The commercials where I've seen these $200+ contraptions, often depict young healthy people touting the significant benefits. I'm thinking a walk to the kitchen or bathroom would easily be more anaerobically beneficial.
As much as I know, most beneficial excerise (such as a yoga vinyasa) takes a measurable level of effort.
I won't be spending that $200 anytime soon.

Now we have the Legxercise Ellipse and the Legxercise Pro.


While I would agree that these electrically-powered devices might minimally improve circulation and muscle tone (especially for the infirmed or elderly), the benefits are marginal, at best. If these devices required actual muscle energy rather than an electrical motor, at least the caloric burn would be more considerable. The commercials where I've seen these $200+ contraptions, often depict young healthy people touting the significant benefits. I'm thinking a walk to the kitchen or bathroom would easily be more anaerobically beneficial.
As much as I know, most beneficial excerise (such as a yoga vinyasa) takes a measurable level of effort.
I won't be spending that $200 anytime soon.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-16 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-17 08:35 pm (UTC)